Update: To view maps & analysis of the summer 2020 protests in the US click here.
Our Map of the Month for November is Count Love (click to explore).
Working with location data, spatial analysis, machine learning, and digital cartography, Tommy Leung and Nathan Perkins built a repository of aggregated protest data beginning with the Women’s March on January 21, 2017.
Count Love is an open source tool that collects, visualizes, and shares open data on protests nationwide.
The goal, Tommy and Nathan write on their website, is to keep “an actual record of ongoing demonstrations and making this data more accessible helps citizens, journalists, and politicians make more compelling cases for a diverse, empathetic, and kind country.”
In this post, you’ll learn how Count Love got started, how the platform and their app work, and what surprising insights have been discovered so far. Tommy and Nathan also shared with us their experience visualizing protest data with CARTO.
Let’s get started.
Count Love began on January 21, 2017 when Tommy and Nathan (and an estimated 5 million other people) participated in the Women’s March showing solidarity with women worldwide protesting the new administration.
Following the march, Tommy wondered what, if any, actions would result from the day’s events.
Tommy and Nathan quickly discovered that analyzing the effectiveness of past protests, demonstrations, and rallies wasn’t possible as enough reliable data had not been collected. To answer their original question, Tommy and Nathan needed to start collecting protest data themselves.
There are lots of challenges when it comes to data collection, data quality, and data storage. When it comes to protest data, these challenges are all the more difficult since protests are sporadic and tend to be local rather than national. Count Love needed a method for collecting data on protests around the country that were often not making national headlines.
Tommy and Nathan wrote a web crawler and text extractor that scans 2,500 local newspapers and tv stations and targets select keywords like “protest,” “demonstration,” and “rally.”
(A more detailed account of their methodology can be found here).
“On any given day,” Tommy and Nathan admit, “data entry is the most important and error prone part of Count Love,” but to ease this process an internal workflow was designed and implemented.
Data collection and data accuracy pose challenges, especially when aggregating data on short-lived events like political protests, but ensuring accuracy is often the most difficult aspect of working with data.
Count Love addresses this challenge using conservative crowd size estimates. When scanning local newspapers, Count Love interprets “a dozen” protesters at an event as 10, “dozens” as 20, hundreds as “100” and so on.
After the March for Science on April 22, 2017, Nathan started developing a new tool that could use protesters mobile devices to collect anonymized protest data.
Nathan built an iOS mobile app, aptly named Count Love App, which allows individuals to register their attendance at a specific event. The GPS coordinates of the mobile device are mapped and then later verified using nearby event information.
This data helps Count Love identify protests and protest attendance numbers that may not have been covered in local media outlets.
Studying the temporal and geographic trends of protest data provided psychographic insights into the activities, attitudes, and values of protesters. To test whether a protest type exhibits a geographic pattern, Count Love mapped the most common protest category for each state:
This map provides a “barometer” on political issues frustrating Americans. Count Love found:
The time-series animation below displays protests across the country since the Women’s March.
The area of each circle is proportionally scaled to the event’s crowd count. The animation slows down around the time of nationally publicized events, including both nationally organized events (Women’s Day, March for Science, etc.) and more locally coordinated responses (Travel Ban, Charlottesville, etc.).
It is interesting to note that protest activity is consistent in rural areas, showing a presence of protests at the local levels of government.
Tommy and Nathan worked with Builder to create an interactive map, imported their aggregated protest data, and layered it on a basemap at the state and congressional district level.
Here’s what they had to say:
Nathan and I use CARTO tiles everywhere—in addition to mapping protests for Count Love, we've also analyzed bike sharing and public transit in Boston by overlaying trip data on top of CARTO's tiles. The tiles are beautiful, clean and retina-ready; I've found that they make our data visualizations easy to comprehend and explore. We like the tiles so much that we actually have a mapping template that we use for new projects, and that we've open-sourced, that hardcodes CARTO as the tile server. I'm not sure what we would do without these tiles!
Working with a local organization that wanted to understand protest activity within the state of Massachusetts, I tried out CARTO Builder for the first time. By simply uploading a CSV file of protests, Builder was able to automatically identify columns and place the Massachusetts protests on a map. With a few minutes of configuring, I had tailored the color scheme and marker size to show protest type and size respectively. It was empowering to be able to so quickly iterate on the appearance and immediately see how the final map would look.
Although I am glad we learned about writing the map code used on our website, my experience with Builder highlighted that there are powerful tools already available to help bring spatial data to life.
Today at the Spatial Data Science Conference in New York City we announced CARTO Workflows, an exciting new tool that enables users of all types and skill levels to harness...Use Cases
Please fill out the below form and we'll be in touch real soon.